Animals and Humans
Statist
ically, animal forms in Israel predominate those of human shape, and the majority of human forms are those of females. These female figurines have been labeled as the “Mother-goddess” or “Astarte” and since they go against the principal of aniconism (aversion to the use of icons) that the book of Deuteronomy describes, scholars have often placed the use of these figurines into the ‘popular’ religion of the common folk of Israel.
Religious Difference amongst the Israelites?
Many assumptions underline this idea. The first is that human figurines are representative of deities. The other, is that the presence of figurines in ancient houses is evidence of popular Israelite worship. This is contrasted by scholars with the official religion of Israel that claims to hate the production and use of such items as religious icons. Did such a religious divide exist in Israel?
The Bull and the Cherubim
One often cited example of unofficial versus official religion in Israel, is the worship at Dan and Bethel of the Bull that was installed by Jeroboam been Nebat, the first king of Israel. These bulls are interpreted as an image of worship, opposed to the Cherubim inside the Jerusalem temple that served as the throne of the invisible God, for the bible says God is “seated upon the cherubim”. So, from the biblical perspective, worship was different in Jerusalem than in Dan and Bethel.
Religious Ways Begin to Change
When we learn of the religious reform of Hezekiah, King of Judah – how he tore down the standing pillars and removed the Asherim from his land, we also hear how he removed an image of worship from the Jerusalem Temple. It was a bronze serpent and was called the Nehushtan which “the people of Israel burned incense to” (2 kings 18:4).
The bible clearly acknowledges that the worship of images and icons (such as the snake) existed at one time in Israel, and that a King who believed it a breach of proper worship took on the task of removing their presence.
The Call to Worship the Invisible God
The Bible tells us that the prohibition of religious images in Israel dates back to the times of Moses. However, the long use of the Nehushtan (the snake) in the Temple shows that either the Jerusalem priests ignored this religious stance against icons, or that the prohibition had not yet taken root in Judahite worship. What does seem to be sure is the growing awareness and introduction of worship of the invisible God alone, soon after the actions of King Hezekiah. Perhaps words like these drove him in his actions, “You shall not make for yourself a graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth” (Deut 5:8).
In conclusion, we see that the official religion in Judah did, at one time, acknowledge the use of images in their worship, and thus one does not see the necessity of classifying figurines and such like icons into the ‘popular’ religion category. It was only a process of time that brought the use of icons to an end.

Newsletter
Blog
Twitter
Facebook
YouTube
Email






I have read and heard that the cherubim may have been lion figures, so the difference may not have been one of iconic versus aniconic even at that point.
Jeremy
http://www.ANEart.com
Hi Jeremy,
Your absolutely correct- the cherubim are mixed creatures (man/lion with wings) and a good Assyrian parallel are those of the guardian of the gates of Khorsabad, Sargon II’s city (these are man/bull/wings). As such the cherubim are an image- just as the ark is an image of a footstool etc. but they are not images of a deity, and as far as the bible shows us, the cherubim were not worshipped. I think that was what i had in mind while writing about Figurines etc.
Thanks again, and its always nice to get some feedback especially on this fascinating discussion about aniconism/iconism in Israel.
B.A.Manning